mirror of
https://github.com/jcreek/LivingDexTracker.git
synced 2026-09-14 17:42:17 +00:00
4af33709a3
Several assertions could not fail: - "the catch update remains saved" was `caught.isChecked() || notes.includes(...)` shared by two scenarios, so either half satisfied both. Split into two steps that each assert the outcome their own scenario is about. - The token-refresh check read a global counter with `> 0` and asserted an upload had happened `some(...)`, both already satisfied by the preceding scenario. It now asserts exactly one refresh, ordered before the upload. - The box step ignored its box argument and asserted on the first N entries on the page; it now scopes to that box and checks its full contents. - The filter step asserted on whichever entry was first after filtering; it now records the caught entry beforehand and names it, and checks the filter did not exclude everything. - The empty-state precondition asserted emptiness instead of establishing it, which a fresh user satisfies for free. - Offline coverage was `caches.keys().length > 0`. It now checks the precache contract: one workbox cache holding the shell and a revisioned web manifest, with _app/immutable assets cached without a revision query. The scenario that claimed to test a trailing slash did not; it is replaced with real offline client-side navigation. The mock provider kept recorded requests, its refresh counter and the fail-uploads switch in one process-wide object that only one step reset, so scenario order was load-bearing and the failing-upload scenario poisoned everything after it. An auto fixture now resets it per scenario, and the mock no longer records its own control-plane calls. That reset is why the suite stays on a single worker, which is now documented. Coverage was gated at 90% per file over an allowlist of exactly the five files that had tests, so new code was invisible to it permanently. It now measures all of src/lib with global thresholds at the measured baseline, and no longer runs the unit tests twice. Also: a global teardown removes the users each run creates, the Supabase wrapper distinguishes a stopped stack from a broken CLI call and detects an unseeded database, the sign-in rate limit is raised above what one serial run needs, and the integration suite no longer falls back to a hard-coded anon key that would mask a misconfigured run. The password-reset scenarios are renamed to what they actually cover: following a real recovery link bounces to /signin, because the browser client persists no cookies and so cannot keep the session it parses out of the URL. The helper for the real flow is left in place and the gap is documented.
48 lines
1.4 KiB
Gherkin
48 lines
1.4 KiB
Gherkin
Feature: Account access
|
|
As a trainer
|
|
I want secure access to my account
|
|
So that only I can update my collection
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Register a new account
|
|
Given I am a new visitor
|
|
When I register with valid account details
|
|
Then I am told to confirm my email
|
|
And a confirmation email is captured locally
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Sign in with valid credentials
|
|
Given I have a confirmed account
|
|
When I sign in with my credentials
|
|
Then I arrive at my Pokédex list
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Reject invalid credentials
|
|
Given I have a confirmed account
|
|
When I sign in with an incorrect password
|
|
Then I see a sign-in error
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Redirect an authenticated visitor
|
|
Given I am signed in
|
|
When I visit the public home page
|
|
Then I arrive at my Pokédex list
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Sign out
|
|
Given I am signed in
|
|
When I sign out
|
|
Then I return to the public home page
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Request a password reset
|
|
Given I have a confirmed account
|
|
When I request a password reset
|
|
Then a password reset email is captured locally
|
|
|
|
@product-review
|
|
Scenario: Reject mismatched replacement passwords
|
|
Given I am signed in on the password reset page
|
|
When I enter two different replacement passwords
|
|
Then I am told that the passwords do not match
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Complete a password reset
|
|
Given I am signed in on the password reset page
|
|
When I enter a valid replacement password
|
|
Then I am told that my password was updated
|
|
|